La Legge Dell'Ortica

Caparezza's song 'La Legge Dell'Ortica' is a sharp critique of societal norms and the music industry, delivered with his signature wit and biting sarcasm. The title itself, which translates to 'The Law of the Nettle,' sets the tone for the song's message: just as nettles sting when touched, Caparezza's lyrics are meant to provoke and irritate, challenging the listener to think critically about the world around them.

In the first verse, Caparezza takes aim at the hypocrisy of the music industry, questioning the integrity of artists who claim to be virtuous while evading taxes. He mocks the superficiality of popular music, suggesting that banal and emotionless content is more readily accepted than meaningful, controversial topics. This is evident in lines like 'se parlo di cazzate tutti dicono che bello' (if I talk nonsense, everyone says it's great) and 'se faccio polemica sono carne da macello' (if I make a fuss, I'm slaughtered). Caparezza's frustration with the industry's preference for safe, unchallenging content is palpable.

The chorus reinforces the song's central theme, with Caparezza declaring his adherence to 'the law of the nettle,' which incites him to write lyrics that irritate and provoke thought. He finds no satisfaction in creating art that doesn't challenge or discomfort the listener. This sentiment is echoed in the repeated line 'non c'è gusto se non irrita' (there's no pleasure if it doesn't irritate).

In the second verse, Caparezza delves into the concept of love, critiquing its often superficial portrayal in popular culture. He questions the true meaning of love, suggesting that it is a concept that can mean everything and nothing at the same time. He also criticizes those who exploit love for personal gain, whether in relationships or in the pursuit of fame and fortune. The verse ends with a nod to his own preference for being 'pungente' (sharp), aligning with the song's overarching theme of provocation.

The final verse continues Caparezza's critique of the music industry, mocking the artificiality and commercialism that pervade it. He expresses disdain for artists who prioritize fame and fortune over genuine expression, and he rejects the idea of conforming to industry standards. Instead, he embraces his role as an irritant, someone who challenges the status quo and refuses to be silenced. The song concludes with a reaffirmation of his commitment to 'the law of the nettle,' a guiding principle that drives his creative process and his desire to provoke and challenge his audience.